Naming · 6 minThe evidence that invented words outperform descriptive ones once a category gets crowded.
The usual objection to an invented word is that nobody knows what it means. That is true on launch day, and it matters less every day after. We do not have a controlled study to offer on this, and we would be wary of anyone who claims one. The case for coined names is structural. It comes from how categories fill up, what trademark protection rewards, and which domains are still there to be owned.
How categories crowd
A new category starts with a handful of companies and a generous supply of obvious words. The first entrants take the plainest descriptions. The next wave takes the variants: the same words with a prefix, a suffix or a second noun attached. By the time the category is crowded, every descriptive option is taken or too close to a competitor, and the names that remain are compromises that cost seconds of explanation in every introduction. Descriptive names converge on the same vocabulary, which is exactly what makes them hard to tell apart.
A descriptive name borrows meaning that belongs to the whole category. A coined name earns meaning that belongs to one company.
Distinctiveness is what you can defend
Broadly, trademark protection favours names that do not describe the goods. A word that simply says what you sell is weak as a mark, because competitors need the same word to describe their own products. An invented word has no prior meaning for anyone else to need. That is why coined names tend to clear faster and leave fewer adjacent marks to argue with. Our own name is one example. GoDotly was coined, and it cleared trademark quickly.
The dot is the other half
Roughly 350 million domains are registered. A very large share of the short, memorable, single-word names in every major extension have been held for two decades by investors with no product behind them. Almost every descriptive name you might want is sitting in that inventory, priced as an asset. An invented word usually is not. If you want the .com and you are willing to invent to get it, the clean version of the name is far more likely to be gettable, and to arrive with an availability position you can act on.
None of this makes a coined name easy. It still has to pass dictation, survive meaning checks across twelve language groups and sound like something a customer wants to say. A bad invented word is worse than a plain descriptive one. But a good one is not the option you settle for once the real words are gone. In a crowded category it is usually the only kind of name that can be owned outright, as a mark, as a dot and as a word people connect with one company.
Share this post
Filed under Naming
All postsKeep reading
Craft, frameworks and arguments
Want these in your inbox?
A short letter, roughly monthly, about naming and the domain aftermarket. No pitching.




